<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Researchers Hijack Storm Worm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allspammedup.com/2008/11/researchers-hijack-storm-worm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allspammedup.com/2008/11/researchers-hijack-storm-worm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed at AAFR</title>
		<link>http://www.allspammedup.com/2008/11/researchers-hijack-storm-worm/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed at AAFR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allspammedup.com/?p=171#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>What a fascinating post--it answers a question that has been on my mind for a long time: Does anybody actually read and click on spam?

It&#039;s a fascinating lesson in economics. Normally a 1 in 12,000,000 CTR rate would be impossibly low. Even if each e-mail cost only 1/10 of a cent to send, the cost per click would be $12,000.00. But if you can send out e-mail truly for free, then, in theory, any click through rate will be profitable. And so it is.

I guess this is why spam isn&#039;t going away any time soon. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fascinating post&#8211;it answers a question that has been on my mind for a long time: Does anybody actually read and click on spam?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a fascinating lesson in economics. Normally a 1 in 12,000,000 CTR rate would be impossibly low. Even if each e-mail cost only 1/10 of a cent to send, the cost per click would be $12,000.00. But if you can send out e-mail truly for free, then, in theory, any click through rate will be profitable. And so it is.</p>
<p>I guess this is why spam isn&#8217;t going away any time soon.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spam ROI - Storm Virus Research Shows Why Spam is Profitable : EmailTalk.org Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.allspammedup.com/2008/11/researchers-hijack-storm-worm/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam ROI - Storm Virus Research Shows Why Spam is Profitable : EmailTalk.org Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allspammedup.com/?p=171#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>[...] to Sue  Walsh over at AllSpammedUp: The researchers discovered that Storm sent out 350 million emails in 26 days, resulting in 28 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Sue  Walsh over at AllSpammedUp: The researchers discovered that Storm sent out 350 million emails in 26 days, resulting in 28 [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

